Monthly Mentor

Stacy Fuller(February)
I am the Director of Education at the Amon Carter Museum of American Art in Fort Worth, Texas. In this role, I work with a talented team of fifteen museum educators to ensure the development, execution, and evaluation of the Amon Carter’s mission-focused educational programs and resources for various audiences. With experience as a museum registrar, in curatorial work, and designing professional development programs for educators, I have a passionate love for works of art and also accessibility—making sure that visitors of all ages, backgrounds, and abilities are able to enter, access, and engage with museum collections.

Go

Membership

Join the largest creative community established exclusively for visual arts educators, college professors, researchers, administrators, and museum educators.

Join NAEA Renew Membership

« Assessment: K.I.S.S. – Keep It Simple Silly | Main | Assessment: Digital Portfolios as Summative Evaluation »

March 15, 2010

Assessment: Research + Practical Classroom Application = Effective Learning and Teaching

The work we do in the art room with children must be based in research; without research support, practical classroom application has little validity.  On the flip side, work in the art room with a focus on research only, his little “real” application.  Research and application must go hand-in-hand to make what we do with kids the most effective and beneficial.

As mentioned in an earlier post, I was part of my district’s art assessment committee several years back.  Our work was based in research. Researchers and research we consulted included Donna Kay Beattie – Assessment in Art Education, Elliott Eisner, Tom Guskey, Rick Stiggins, Carmen Armstrong - Designing Assessment in Art, NAEP Report 1994 and several others.

Last week’s blog posts focused on formative assessment.  This week, let’s talk summative evaluation.  First, you may notice the use of the terms, assessment and evaluation. Assessment is formative in nature using data to improve instruction.   Evaluation is summative in nature and focuses on the determination of a final grade as in a grade given on a report card.  There are many ways we can provide summative evaluation for students.  Two I use are rubrics and P.A.T.S. (Praise, Ask, Tell, Suggest).  The teacher can develop rubrics solely or the teacher can create them with student input.  I’ve found with multiple classes, it is often easier for me to develop the rubric from the criteria and standards I’ve set for the project.  Projects are open-ended and provide for multiple solutions.  However, students understand they must meet certain criteria for evaluation.    Below is an example of a rubric I created for a Georgia O’Keeffe unit for 5th graders:

O'Keeffe rubric

Students complete the rubric when finished with their art.  I then complete the rubric as well providing written feedback. I’ve also had peers complete the same rubric for a classmate and turn in the rubrics for comparison.

Another tool I use, which can be both formative and summative is called P.A.T.S.  The focus is on peer feedback.  If used formatively, students benefit from the information provided through the feedback.  If used summatively, an educator can use the comments to grade criticism as well as using writing in art.  Please visit this link for details about P.A.T.S.:

P.A.T.S. 
See example of P.A.T.S sheet below.

PATS sheet

Assessment and evaluation are all about giving feedback.  It’s about sharing with students and families how students are achieving in our classrooms.  Later this week, I will share with you information about electronic portfolios as summative assessment.

-Bob Reeker

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e5550df25288340120a93aee00970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Assessment: Research + Practical Classroom Application = Effective Learning and Teaching:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.