Assessment: Professional Learning Communities (P.L.C.s) and Creativity
Whether Professional Learning Communities is a new term
or one you've heard before or have experienced, it is a term you want to become
familiar with in the near future.
P.L.C.s provide an opportunity and a time for teachers to discuss what
teaching is all about...student achievement. But as with most things in life,
one must learn to balance the evidence-collecting portion of P.L.C.s and the
open-ended problem solving of creativity. Professional Learning Communities can offer the vehicle in
which art educators can share what they teach, how they know their students are
learning it, how they work with those students who don't learn it, and finally,
how they provide further experiences for those students who do understand
it. Goals are written as
S.M.A.R.T. goals: S-Specific,
M-Measurable, A-Attainable, R-Realistic, T-Timely.
As is with most things in life, work with P.L.C.s and
creativity is a balancing act.
Lincoln Public Schools started the PLC model three years ago; the last
two years, art specialists have been allowed to meet to work on goals
pertaining to the art curriculum.
Although we have come a long way in understanding and using the PLC
model, we are still learning and growing.
And part of that growth is the balancing act of addressing measurable
goals and still maintaining the creative growth of our children.
In my next entry, I plan to share more specifics about P.L.C.s. Please share your experiences using the P.L.C. model for assessment.
-Bob Reeker


Arts Educators in Pennsylvania are working together to design their own professional development in collaborative inquiry groups. This is a similar model to PLCs. I am the facilitator for a collaborative inquiry group of art and music teachers who are working together to explore learner-centered pedagogical approaches. Leslie Gates and I will present about this project, Arts Educator 2.0 at NAEA next month. Enjoying your posts, Bob.
Posted by: Mary Elizabeth Meier | March 23, 2010 at 09:37 PM
Mary,
Thank you for sharing. Whether the model is PLCs or one you develop, allowing time for instructors to reflect on and discuss good teaching and learning is vital. Good luck with your presentation in Baltimore.
Bob
Posted by: Bob Reeker | March 24, 2010 at 10:26 AM
In our district we too have been working with PLC's over the last 3 years. Our department consists of vocal and instrumental music as well as visual art. Our Smart Goal document is specific to both visual and performing arts, let broad enough to encompass the variety of classes per each discipline.
The Smart Goals measure student self-concept, how they feel they do in a variety of classroom skills.
The categories are Procedural, Technique, Evaluation Skills, and Craftsmanship/Musicianship. Within each category there are 4 statements that the students rate themselves on (i.e. I have an understanding of art history and its connection to my work).
We have been reworking the document to streamline the process, and have identified several statements (I perform to the best of my ability) that are applicable to both visual and performing art and are analyzing data at this point.
Posted by: Tim Garth | March 29, 2010 at 12:33 PM
Tim,
Your process sounds very comprehensive! I'm sure you are getting wonderful results due to the structure you have developed in your district. Congratulations!
Posted by: Bob Reeker | March 30, 2010 at 06:57 AM